It is about the Church of England and the main reason why they shit on victims and pretend to care about safeguarding.
Victoria Derbyshire will be interviewing several abuse survivors regarding the Church of England and their conflicted insurers.
Showing posts with label Archbishop of Canterbury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Archbishop of Canterbury. Show all posts
Thursday, 20 July 2017
Vital News
Please listen to BBC Radio 2 at 9am tomorrow morning.
It is about the Church of England and the main reason why they shit on victims and pretend to care about safeguarding.
Victoria Derbyshire will be interviewing several abuse survivors regarding the Church of England and their conflicted insurers.
It is about the Church of England and the main reason why they shit on victims and pretend to care about safeguarding.
Victoria Derbyshire will be interviewing several abuse survivors regarding the Church of England and their conflicted insurers.
Saturday, 8 July 2017
I need to share this with you urgently!
As well as schools, this is what the Church of England's fake safeguarding campaign is all about!
I knew this, but no proper response is being made by Ecclesiastical.
Have a read of this link below, it is vital, thanks Cathy.
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/sea-of-complicity-blog-on-abuse-by-the-church-of-england/
I knew this, but no proper response is being made by Ecclesiastical.
Have a read of this link below, it is vital, thanks Cathy.
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2017/07/08/sea-of-complicity-blog-on-abuse-by-the-church-of-england/
Tuesday, 27 June 2017
How to get a response from Lambeth Palace
If you are an abuse victim who has been destroyed by a vain and silly Archbishop (Welby)
It takes four years and the church getting negative publicity for poor safeguarding, and desperately using the press to try to pretend that they have changed, while their victim/s assure them that they haven't, and they don't like the idea of the press and media picking up on it, so they bullshit all over the victim/s.
Assholes.
It takes four years and the church getting negative publicity for poor safeguarding, and desperately using the press to try to pretend that they have changed, while their victim/s assure them that they haven't, and they don't like the idea of the press and media picking up on it, so they bullshit all over the victim/s.
Assholes.
Sunday, 22 January 2017
Gavin Ashenden
I am getting a tremendous amount of traffic to my blog from people looking for Gavin Ashenden. This tends to happen when he is attacking people, and this is no different.
He is ranting in the Times about the Koran being used in a Cathedral.
Well a) did anyone notice, the old dears are usually asleep, and b) isn't it a good idea to educate people to stop the blind Islamophobia continuing to rise? c) Isn't Ashenden's attack on the Archbishop more to do with the secret court that he faced? d) The Archbishop should resign, because he is a cowardly corrupt lying crook, not because of the Koran.
Gavin Ashenden spends his life attacking and showing off, and, having never met me, took part in a press and media smear campaign against me, full of lies, some of which is available here:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/hg-review-team/very-cuttings/paperback/product-23028126.html
Ashenden isn't in any postion to lay down the law to anyone, aside from his public attacks on me without having both sides of the story, he is a divorcee, which is against Jesus' teachings, and he has relentlessly attacked and slurred abuse victims and the mentally ill, as well as making racist and xenaphobic attacks in the press constantly.
He thinks very highly indeed of himself, and the Church don't appear to have any ability to silence his hatred and rants, even though he is a safeguarding danger.
He really needs a copy of the Bible, I don't think he can ever have seen a copy or read it.
This is Tony the Prof's blog. look at what a churchgoer in Jersey has observed about Gavin Ashenden:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Gavin+Ashenden
This is Bob's blog, look through this and see what Ashenden was part of:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/
It is time that Ashenden was asked to step down, he is mean-spirited, untruthful, hateful, prejudiced, proud and boastful, he is bringing Christianity into disrepute and would be bringing the church into disrepute if they weren't already, and the church are scared to face up to him because he is chaplain to the Queen.
He is ranting in the Times about the Koran being used in a Cathedral.
Well a) did anyone notice, the old dears are usually asleep, and b) isn't it a good idea to educate people to stop the blind Islamophobia continuing to rise? c) Isn't Ashenden's attack on the Archbishop more to do with the secret court that he faced? d) The Archbishop should resign, because he is a cowardly corrupt lying crook, not because of the Koran.
Gavin Ashenden spends his life attacking and showing off, and, having never met me, took part in a press and media smear campaign against me, full of lies, some of which is available here:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/hg-review-team/very-cuttings/paperback/product-23028126.html
Ashenden isn't in any postion to lay down the law to anyone, aside from his public attacks on me without having both sides of the story, he is a divorcee, which is against Jesus' teachings, and he has relentlessly attacked and slurred abuse victims and the mentally ill, as well as making racist and xenaphobic attacks in the press constantly.
He thinks very highly indeed of himself, and the Church don't appear to have any ability to silence his hatred and rants, even though he is a safeguarding danger.
He really needs a copy of the Bible, I don't think he can ever have seen a copy or read it.
This is Tony the Prof's blog. look at what a churchgoer in Jersey has observed about Gavin Ashenden:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Gavin+Ashenden
This is Bob's blog, look through this and see what Ashenden was part of:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/
It is time that Ashenden was asked to step down, he is mean-spirited, untruthful, hateful, prejudiced, proud and boastful, he is bringing Christianity into disrepute and would be bringing the church into disrepute if they weren't already, and the church are scared to face up to him because he is chaplain to the Queen.
Thursday, 1 December 2016
A formal Letter
Formal Complaint against the Archbishop of Canterbury and the failure to record the matter properly by phone this morning CC: IICSA and to be published online.
Dear
William Nye and Archbishop's council,
This
complaint is copied to the police, who for years have beaten and imprisoned me
to try to silence me for the Church of England. I am alive but horrifically
damaged and eventually I will collapse as Bob Hill did while trying to defend
me against the Church.
The
Church haven't taken responsibility for Bob's collapse or the harm to me, but
the police have a duty to deal with the Church, the police are afraid to deal
with Bishops and Archbishops and their hefty and Godless legal teams that
invalidate the Church of England, as is seen in the cases of Peter Ball and
Bishop Bell and the former Bishop of Gloucester, the police prefer victim
suicides and silencing victims because they are afraid of the Church and it's
massive and abusive power.
But
nonetheless they do have my complaints and they will be asked why they didn't
deal with them as well as why they refused for so many years to stop the Church
of England from harming me. What the police can do to start with, is formally
ask the Church to refer my case to a competent safeguarding body outside of the
Church of England, which is what I have now be requesting for three months.
Police
please note, the Bishop of Winchester has breached a court agreement over the
Steel report. He was not allowed to publish or distribute the Steel report
without having first got agreement on its accuracy and consent from me, and
instead of telling the press and media and general public this, he has claimed
that the Steel report is valid and that he is handing it over to the conflicted
and biased Bishop Gladwin to include in his report.
Handing
it over to Gladwin breaches the court order instantly. The Bishop has still
failed to send me my copy of the Steel report, which despite being written by a
conflicted member of the Jersey circle and not including me, was supposed to be
about my case.
This
morning I phoned the office of the Archbishop's council as it is obvious that
nothing is being done about the open corruption, deceit and abuse by the
Archbishop of Canterbury and Bishop of Winchester in my case and the very
serious harm that he and the Bishop of Winchester have done to me.
Surely
it is the biggest safeguarding failure in the Church of England apart from the
Peter Ball and Kendal House cases, and yet my case is unique in that the harm
was carried out while the Archbishop and Paul Butler have been keeping up this
front about the Church 'caring about safeguarding'. And less unique in that the Church of England
intend to keep silence and not act while the wrongdoers involved are still in
office.
There
is no good outcome of the Church spending a million pounds to publicly destroy
a very broken and homeless vulnerable adult and uphold her abusers publicly,
there is no good conclusion and no glory in it for the Church of England, all
they have achieved is a statement that they will protect abusers, publicly at
any cost, even at the cost of the life of a brave man and a vulnerable adult
and they will discredit the victim after carrying out a number of biased
whitewashes that they incredibly try to label independent. Someone needs to
define both safeguarding and independent to the Church as they consistently
mis-use these words.
The
Church don't care about safeguarding, they care about covering up, looking
good, and using anything they can as PR and limelight stunts. The Church have
been persistently using the crime of sexual assault as a limelight stunt since
the current Archbishop took his position, which reflects very badly on him
indeed. But anyone who saw him use his 'Father/s' as a press stunt will know
that he has never been fit for his office as he doesn't represent Jesus in his
twisted use of his personal life to gain attention. Why are the police and
authorities not challenging the Church on these serious abuses of the public
and the vulnerable?
This
morning's phone conversation reflected the fact that nothing has changed in the
closed fortress of cover up and denial in the Church of England. I doubt with
all my heart that anyone will 'phone me back' as suggested by the terrified
woman who was breaking the 'no communication with HG' rule' this morning. And
if only it was just me, Eli Ward, Graham Sawyer and every victim who has
contacted me has been treated this way.
The
Archbishop's persistent use of church sexual assaults as a PR stunt whilst not
changing the Church's horrendous treatment of victims means that he isn't
really in a position to continue, but his very blatant and open favouritism in
the Jersey Deanery case means he certainly should step down, and this is a
formal complaint to that effect.
The
damage to me of the public discrediting by the Archbishop and his refusal to
deal with open wrongdoing in the Jersey Deanery and by the Bishop of Winchester
means he cannot be upheld as a Godly man or an example of Christianity, and his
habit of using current affairs as press stunts to get limelight for the Church
annoys a lot of people.
What
kind of human being does as the Archbishop has done, in upholding both the
Jersey Deanery and the Bishop of Winchester in open and blatant deceit, abuse
of power and very serious harm to a vulnerable adult and claiming that no wrong
has been done? I am still suffering the way the Church has publicly destroyed
me, and neither the Bishop or Archbishop have met me or recorded my story, what
a terrible way to waste a million pounds, on destroying a vulnerable adults who
has already suffered too much.
And although
the lady I spoke to this morning was perfectly polite, it became clear that she
wanted to get off the phone and close the matter down quite quickly once she
realised who I was. So nothing has changed in the Church's fortress of denial
and corruption. Branding a vulnerable adult is never acceptable, branding them
when they are homeless and destroyed by the Church is as far from Christianity
as you can get.
Why, in
this day and age is the Church still allowed to abuse its power this way? And
incidentally why is this wealthy corporation allowed to have dual roles as
charity and government department and why does the Synod hoard billions and
make local churches waste sermons on begging money to keep the church running?
Why if the Church is a 'Christian Church' are they not dealing with abuse and
abusers properly and making provision for victims?
When
the Archbishop publicly destroyed me earlier this year, with the help of the
Bishop of Winchester, he had never met me, neither had the Bishop.
The
National Safeguarding team added to the injury caused by the Bishop and
Archbishop and their complicit press by claiming that 'The Church didn't mean
to hurt me' what a stupid thing to say to someone who has been publicly
destroyed for three and a half years by the Church through the press and media,
what exactly did they mean to do then? The National Safeguarding Team are invalid
until or unless they are independent of the Church of England and not under the
people who are doing the wrong and are not acting complicit with wrongdoers to
cover up and excuse wrongdoing.
This
morning on the phone the woman started out as all Church of England people do,
all polite, she asked if it was a safeguarding or general complaint, well it is
both but the National Safeguarding Team were told to ignore me when they didn't
get what they wanted from me. Graham Tilby actually told me he was told to
ignore the distress that he and Jane Dodds provoked in their denial of my
situation and efforts to force a meeting on me rather than deal with my
complaint.
They
wanted me to be complicit in the Bishop's discrediting attack on me, and tried
to make me and the Bishop communicate despite the fact that I took him to court
in 2014 to stop him from killing me by handing the whitewash steel report over
to William Bailhache, one of the conflicted Church-States members who had
elected Steel for the cover up.
The
Bishop and Archbishop, while misleading the press and public with impunity,
seem unable to tell the press or the public about how Steel was conflicted and
I was forced to file against the Bishop as
litigant in person when I was so ill.
The
National Safeguarding team have refused to address this massive safeguarding
failure of the past three and a half years and kept on and on trying to get me
into a meeting 'To support me', and no doubt other vulnerable victims fall for
this part in the Church's cover-up machine, but not me, I won't meet with
people who are complicit in cover-up and harm to a vulnerable adult, who have
stood by and knowingly allowed harm as Tilby, Dodds and Murray have, and who have
been engaged in this harm as well, for example liaising with the Bishop of
Winchester to cover his back. How terrible that anyone who claims to be in
safeguarding would act this way.
If the
National Safeguarding Team can't see the very serious misconducts and harm to
me by the actions of the Archbishop, Bishop and Jersey Deanery and complicit
press, they can certainly see the harm to Bob Hill for defending my life with
his own, the only reasons they have not acted is because they don't understand
safeguarding or they are unwilling to deal with the powerful wrongdoers, both
of these things invalidate them and while the wrongdoers remain and I have not
had an equal voice in the press and media who carried out the Church of
England's massive abuse of power in this case, then I remain suffering.
You
can't get all abuse victims, vulnerable as they are, to obligingly trot into
the cover-ups and cover-up meetings that Dodds and Tilby kept putting me under
pressure to bow to and attend. I wonder how many other victims have been
silenced this way?
On the
subject, Tilby claimed that Elaine Rose, the woman who has defended and
condoned the bad behaviour of the Jersey Deanery, had any right to liaise with
the conflicted Jersey Safeguarding Partnership over their whitewash serious
case review, and he claimed he could get a copy of the serious case review
whitewash.
He didn't have my consent, and no-one has had
my consent to view that set-up whitewash. It is another defamatory cover-up
created by a woman who is facing charges for perversion of the course of
justice, and it was created for and by the same dignitaries in Jersey who
engineered the Steel whitewash. It is invalid and since the failure of the
Steel report, those dignitaries in Jersey have clamoured for the release of
this whitewash and even launched a troll attack on me using a fake gov.je email
address.
This
morning the lady on the phone was taking my details as normal until I mentioned
the Korris report, and all of a sudden, whoever was in the office with her
tipped her the wink and she rapidly tried to close the matter down and started
talking about how 'someone would give me a response' rather than anything being
done about my complaint. No-one will 'give me a response' because the Church
take legal advice against their victims and their legal advice is to ignore me
and not speak to me.
Safeguarding? No, they destroyed me to close
the Jersey matter down and now they are ignoring me, so the best thing the
Archbishop can do is stop using sexual assault to try to glorify the Church in
the press and media at the expense of victims, and step down.
The Church
recently had another feeble effort over their inadequate and conflicted
'independent inquiries in the press', they chose a man who protected Greville
Janner and shared an office with another high profile paedophile, to lead an
investigation into the Bishop Bell case, which will undoubtedly harm the
victim, and yet they haven't arranged an independent investigation into the
misconducts of the Archbishop and Bishop in my case, where a million pounds was
spent, mainly on lawyers and PR firms because of the complete and utter mess
they made in launching the non-independent and unqualified 'Korris' report into
the press and allowing me to be publicly destroyed. The police need to respond
to the illegal release of the Korris report as it was sent to them to compound
the cover-up that they took part in through harming me and not protecting me from
the Church of England when asked.
This
matter isn't going to go away through the Church ignoring me, and the
Safeguarding team who failed me have been asked to refer my case to a
safeguarding body outside of the Church of England and to make sure an independent
inquiry is called, and presumably the reason that they can't call an inquiry in
my case as they did in the cases of Bell, Ball, etc is because the wrongdoers
involved are still in their positions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nonetheless,
this is a repeat request for an independent inquiry and this letter and
everything I have said will not go away, nor will the open and glaring wrongs
of the Church of England.
I
wouldn't put it past the Church to do another whitewash without telling me and
claim the same results as well as claiming an independent inquiry was carried
out. No, as yet no inquiry has included me, no action was taken over conflicts
of interests, no appropriate action was taken, and in Jersey they allowed open
and free tampering with my records to cover up and aid the whitewash, how
horrifying. The Church of England needs to be properly regulated, the
authorities need to stop bowing to this massive power-abusive corporation which
is akin to a Nazi regime, no-one should stand by now, because my case and the
open abuse of power and illegal actions is a step too far.
The
Church need to decide whether they are a charity or a government department and
be regulated either as a charity or a government department, and with their bad
record and bad name, that regulation needs to be from outside the Church.
Police,
please be aware, as I have told you before, that I am due to suffer another
vicious onslaught from the press and media when the Dean announces his
forthcoming retirement, which seems for some reason to be delayed. The damage
to me by the press and media, since the Church have released my details and
identity to the general public, is a criminal act and you are aware from my
correspondence just how weak and destroyed I am.
This
is a formal complaint and also a formal request for independent and police intervention
into my case.
Sincerely,
JJ/HG
- Korris report victim
Sunday, 12 June 2016
Archbishop Abuse Case
Dear Editors, Press regulation authorities, Home Office, Safeguarding Boards and other recipients,
The Archbishop of Canterbury's corporation, the Church of England, is under investigation for systemic crimes against Children.
Some of those children died as children as a result or committed suicide as adults as a result of their abuse. All survivors are affected for life by what they endured.
I am a vulnerable adult Church abuse survivor who the Archbishop has publicly destroyed and discredited while falsely claiming, with the help of the press and media, that that the Church of England are very hot on safeguarding. The press and media buy this without question and broadcast it and mislead the general public, anguishing the voiceless survivors who know that the truth is very different.
I can assure you in truth that my experience is that the Church of England continue to fail to understand even the basics of safeguarding. No abuse survivor should ever have to fight for their life against the Church as I and others have.
I am disabled and with no support, so I have to earn a living despite being incapacitated by the Church. My working day starts at 6am, 7 days a week, delivering newspapers. Unfortunately some people in my area still read the Daily Mail, so presumably some believe what is written in it.
Every time the Daily Mail or another paper offers a front page advertisement to the Church of England in the form of Archbishop Justin Welby, I am left ill and incapacitated and I can't do my work. If I have to stop work, I go hungry, it is as simple as that, and this has been made known to the Archbishop, safeguarding board and Lambeth Palace repeatedly.
The Press and media have been asked, and a complaint has gone to the IPSO that abuse victims should not have to endure the Church of England showing off while crimes of sexual assault by members of the Church are being investigated.
Nor should the Church have the inordinate power that leads to them being able to make press releases that are published without question, even at the expense of the Church's victims, as has happened in my case. No one challenges the Church publicly, they are reminiscent of a Dictatorship, their actions and press releases are not regulated, policed or monitored.
They are a wealthy organization, inappropriately combining being a charity and a government department whilst being a domain of the wealthy middle class, the Church belongs in a bygone age where abuse of power in this way was almost acceptable, the Church is not a place for the vulnerable and it's exclusiveness isn't appropriate and isn't justified by it's low numbers of select members of society.
How can middle class people understand abuse or conflicted middle class judges investigate abuse in an organization that they subscribe to, when they don't understand vulnerability or what abuse does to a person? Where can hurt, vulnerable and voiceless victims turn when the Church is in government and contains a large amount of the judges, lawyers and other officials who would oversee abuse complaints, most people have no chance of justice and most vulnerable people would not know of the conflicts of interests, they would only know that they aren't granted justice.
The Archbishop has gone from very recently using the press and media to publicly discredit me and what I have suffered, to using the press and media to intervene in the Europe Debate, despite the Church of England's own rules forbidding clergy from influencing votes and elections. The Press and Media have published this without question and have done so while the church are under investigation for systemic sexual assaults on children. Any other organization under such investigation would be ashamed and avoiding limelight, but Justin Welby is a desparate narcissist, greedy for attention, gobbling the limelight without closing his mouth or chewing.
But most seriously, in my case, a serious formal complaint of abuse has been made against him, to his own safeguarding board, who as yet, have failed to fulfil their duty of care in any way and are sitting on their hands with their mouths wide open as Welby continues to dance and shout ever more desparately.
Justin Welby has a serious formal complaint of abuse of a vulnerable adult against him, which has been made to his own safeguarding team, who are obliged to investigate but appear unwilling of afraid to do so, the complaint has also gone to the Home Office.
This is because the police, social services and all other agencies are willing to act to protect the Church but not to protect one of their victims or challenge the Church. And the safeguarding team seem unable to do anything except suddenly actually start answering their hotline because the National Inquiry are Investigating the Church of England. Can you believe, the CofE safeguarding board have actually employed someone to answer their phone instead of it going to voicemail! Incredible, what if they start safeguarding as well?!
The Church have had inordinate power over the press and media and inappropriate influence in public affairs for too long, and no organisation that systemically abuses children sexually and in other ways has any right to such limelight.
One of the most amusing things about this case is that it has been presented to the Queen and 10 Downing Street because no authority or agency dares to stand up to the Church of England, and within weeks, there is the press and media, running pictures of the Archbishop with the Queen and Prime Minister, there is the Archbishop doing a sickly sweet 'tribute' to the Queen instead of receiving a reprimand from her. Do the Queen and Prime Minister uphold this narcissist and the damage he does and the abuse his Church are guilty of? Do they understand the distress caused to abuse survivors by the Archbishop's behaviour?
The Church's communications team and press team have received this complaint persistently in writing and by email and phone, and yet it continues. Obviously they have no regard whatsoever for the harm they do.
I would ask again for the press and media and the overseers of the press and media to make sure the Church's abuse of the press and media comes to an end. The use of front page headlines to discuss the Archbishop's personal life instead of news earlier this year disgusted a lot of people, and today's headline of the Archbishop trying to use the press to tell the plebs or his church how to vote was not only against the Church of England's own legislation, it was deeply inappropriate. The Church are not yet in full power as a dictatorship over this country but they are trying very hard to be, with the help of the press and media. However, we are still a democracy for the moment, and we do still think for ourselves, and many many people on social media today will be angry and disgusted with the Archbishop abusing his power yet again.
On a lighter note, the Archbishop may well swing the vote by his headlines, he is despised and held in contempt enough to make his yes vote cause a surge of no votes that will leave Britain separated from the European Union. Excellent.
If the Archbishop needs to go into politics, he needs to be elected to a genuine political party, the Church of England Party is not officially registered although they act as if they think they are.
The Church of England's inordinate power is a risk to the vulnerable in society, and we are going into the fourth year of their safeguarding board behaving inappropriately with regards my case, but they have over three years of evidence, even in the press and media indelibly, of the Archbishop and Bishop harming a vulnerable adult, and they have no choice but to investigate or be invalid as a safeguarding board. And even if they whitewash it, as is the tradition of the Church of England, they must act and while doing so, they need to ask the abusers to stop abusing the press.
There has been no investigation into my case, only whitewashes and public smearing of me.
The complaint will remain and will be escalated and escalated. In the meantime, however many years it takes, the safeguarding board are obliged to stop the Archbishop from furthering the harm he has done, ie his persistent abuse of the press and media and misleading of the general public. They are also obliged to ask the Archbishop to apologize publicly to me for years of whitewash conflicted reports and smearing and discrediting press releases with no consideration for my wellbeing or safety, and the injuries inflicted on me as a result.
I know the Archbishop likes to 'apologize' publicly and emptily to vulnerable groups to make the Church look good, and that is always pre-meditated, in the press and media spotlight, and with no genuine concern or care for the groups that he is using for his apologies. For example he blared an apology in the press to the LGBT community, while the Bishop of Winchester was publicly dismissing a homosexual couple for being homosexual, and Queen's chaplain Gavin Ashenden was also publicly attacking homosexuals and conveniently forgetting that as a divorcee clergyman, he has no credibility in the context of the Bible.
But in my case, The Archbishop and his Church appear to think that their public harm to me is acceptable, after their original 'show' apology to me, they have destroyed me solidly and relentlessly. They won't apologize if it means they are held responsible.
I have asked and will continue to ask for an independent investigation into what has happened to me in the Church of England, from the abuse and prejudice to the cover-ups and lies and whitewash reports to the abuse of me through the press by the Church and the hate attacks against me as a result of the church abusing my case. Could Graham Tilby and Jane Dodds of the National safeguarding board of the Church of England please start responding appropriately and stop making excuses for the Church?
Just to forestall the Safeguarding board's misleading response to this. They will claim that they 'invited me to meet with them'.
The Church do box ticking meetings if someone persists in complaining. I have refused a meeting because the offer came while the same safeguarding board was looking on as I was harmed in the press as well as being contacted by a Bishop who has behaved so shamefully and harmfully that I took him to court.
The safeguarding board not only kept allowing this Bishop to distress me by contacting me despite my court action against him, they claimed that 'The Church didn't mean to hurt me' and the contact 'wasn't meant to hurt me'. Can you see how ridiculous that is? I took the Bishop to court for fun did I? A litigant in person, no access to legal aid or representation, a destroyed vulnerable adult, terrified and sick with distress, up against a church lawyer who lied, a vulnerable adult forced to fight for her life alone, and the safeguarding board don't understand why contact from that Bishop is wrong, distressing and a serious safeguarding issue! Especially as that Bishop has continued to harm me and mislead the press despite the court order! A meeting is not an option while the safeguarding board fail to protect me or even genuinely acknowledge or action my complaints. They have the evidence, it is extremely prolific and available widely.
This letter is sent cc the National Safeguarding Board of the Church of England, who by now, will have had to inform the Archbishop that a serious formal complaint with evidence has been made against him and the church, they are thus obliged also to ensure that while he is under investigation and while the Church are under investigation for hundreds, even thousands of sexual assaults, the Archbishop ceases to harm their victims by abusing the press, especially abusing the press to harm one of their victims.
Also, Jane Dodds and Graham Tilby, please make sure the Archbishop's breach of Church laws in interfering publicly in the Europe vote is referred to the correct department and that he is disciplined. In the end, someone is going to view the records of your action or inaction.
Interestingly the scorn of the Archbishop on social media brought up another of his press spin matters, his pretence that he was going to house migrants at Lambeth Palace - what - as slaves? The Church of England have a secret apartheid policy against the vulnerable, the vulnerable are not welcome on church property, this hurts and isolates the vulnerable and I have suffered it and been injured by it, secretly excluded. isn't it time the Church of England were policed instead of being the dictatorship in our democracy? The Safeguarding Board have failed for many years to answer me about this apartheid, which undoubtedly increases abuse but is there for the Church's insurance purposes. Do you know they even dismiss clergy who become vulnerable through illness or injury? Several have contacted me about this.
The Church of England was founded on adultery and has never improved on that, and it has no place in society any more, especially not as a lawless dictatorship that no-one challenges. The Daily Mail, Telegraph and BBC especially should be ashamed to keep publishing Justin Welby's advertisements without any censorship or thought for his victims.
Thank you for reading this. This will now be published online. Most vulnerable people and survivors are voiceless, I am nearly voiceless, but I can write, and through my writing, I speak for the voiceless vulnerable and survivors if they would like my voice to be heard as theirs.
JJ
Sunday, 15 May 2016
Serious formal complaint against the Archbishop of Canterbury
15/05/2016
Serious formal complaint against Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby and the Bishop of Winchester. Complaint addressed to Graham Tilby and Jane Dodds of the Church of England's National Safeguarding Unit with copies sent to 10 Downing Street, Buckingham Palace, the National Child abuse Inquiry and the Press and media who continue to advertise and glorify the Archbishop at the expense of abuse victims:
Dear Graham Tilby and Jane Dodds and other recipients,
I understand that the Church of England have for some reason felt the need to pretend to care about my welfare recently, suddenly and too late.
Unfortunately the Church of England's relentless and severe damage to me means I see this as a farce; and while defamatory, misleading and untrue reports and articles about me by and on behalf of the Jersey Deanery are still available online and in circulation, and while no-one in my case has been dismissed or even reprimanded for their behaviour, the Church's sudden and belated pretence of care is distressing and not remotely credible. The Church have had years to put this right and have continued to oppress or ignore me instead.
As you will be aware, I made a clergy discipline complaint against the Archbishop as well as Bishops Butler and Dakin 2014. And as you must be aware, the Clergy discipline complaint was not dealt with due to there only being a corrupt and ineffectual system. Indeed I was threatened by Mark Hedley, who claimed he could not understand the huge volume of evidence of the Bishop of Winchester's serious misconduct.
As I said in reply, if he really could not see what was before him and really thought he could make veiled threats to protect the Bishop, he should resign. Incredibly the case was then offered to the conflicted Archbishop who had overseen the Bishop of Winchester's harm to me and condoned it.
The Archbishop of Canterbury's persistent showing off in the press has become unbearable, he has told the whole nation that he is a narcissist and he has lied enough about the Church and Safeguarding, when will he be asked to be quiet? His narcissism is unfair on the victims that he and his church has made suffer. And in my case, the Archbishop of Canterbury is directly responsible for my continued suffering, and has openly upheld the wrongdoers in my case, especially Bishop Dakin and Bob Key, as you will have seen in Bob Hill's recording of the BBC Jersey interview in the link a few paragraphs down.
The Archbishop isn't credible in making statements regarding 'Bishops being committed to safeguarding' while he has overseen and worked with the Bishop of Winchester in publicly destroying, discrediting and defaming me, leading to severe and irreparable harm, not just to me, but to Bob Hill, the man who singlehandedly tried to prevent me from being killed by the Bishop, Archbishop, church and press and media's actions.
This evidence in the link above shows that while Welby is actively protecting the Church by misleading the general public through the press, giving the image that the Church cares about safeguarding, which it does not. He himself, Justin Welby, has actively harmed a vulnerable adult. The Church, with the evidence now presented, are obliged to take action, and if their 'safeguarding' measures have improved, as repeatedly boasted by the Archbishop in the press, then he himself must now face disciplinary action under those measures.
Most recipients will have seen my 'Letters to the Press' articles now, the first of Which is actually to the Prime Minister, but unfortunately the Guardian Newspaper is persisting in Publishing the Archbishop's 'safeguarding' propaganda while I remain suffering, and I object.
Here is an open letter version of a summary of 'Letters to the Press' which is online with my other open letters in order to protect me from further harm from the Church of England. I am voiceless, and the only way I can try to protect myself from the relentless defamation of me is to publish these things.
Part of the purpose of this letter is to ask once again for the resignation of the Bishop of Winchester, who's prolonged harm to me has been public and full of blatant misconducts and even illegal actions. And also, as the Archbishop is aware of my severe distress at his narcissistic showing off while he has played a significant part in destroying me, I am also asking him to resign now as well.
And I would ask Her Majesty the Queen and also The Right Honourable Prime Minister David Cameron, to ensure that these men do leave their posts as they have shown psychopathic disregard for my welfare and safety whilst using the Press and Media to glorify themselves.
I would also ask for the annulment of the whitewash reports and a genuine apology from the Church to be made public.
I am exhausted from years of fighting for my safety and suffering trauma and fear with rogue journalists and cranks harming me as a result of the Bishop of Winchester's insane actions in launching a one-sided whitewash into the press about my case, condoned and upheld by Bishop Butler and the Archbishop.
The smears and attacks on me on top of homelessness, destitution and illness caused by the Church, have repeatedly nearly led to my suicide.
And if I had committed suicide, the Church would have continued to abuse me and my case, as they did with one of Peter Ball's victims who committed suicide. Paul Butler tried to glorify the Church by 'praising' this dead man, which was disgusting.
Although in my case, if I had given up the fight instead of taking the Bishop to court, the Church of England would have published more whitewash reports without taking any responsibility.
And this has happened under Archbishop Welby's direction. So nothing has changed since Paul Butler and others protected Peter Ball when he was in office. This is why I am asking the press, the Prime Minister and the Queen again to ask Justin Welby and the Church of England to stop abusing the press.
Justin Welby cannot credibly continue to talk about Safeguarding and abuse while he has been involved in the abuse of a vulnerable adult through mis-use of the press and whitewash conflicted internal Church of England reports.
Repeatedly and for show, the Church have shown this inward-looking effort of 'meeting legislation needs' through trying to force their version of 'help' on me illegally, while publicly destroying me. They really do not have a clue about safeguarding, and it was safeguarding director Jane Fisher who damaged me more than my abusers by trying to silence me to prevent press scandal.
This letter is another plea for the resignation of the Bishop of Winchester, and the Archbishop as well as he continues to be deceitful in the press and mislead and hurt people, and it is a reminder of my letters to the press about this, and it is also a reminder to the Church of England that because they are incapable of safeguarding they need to arrange outside intervention, and also they need to arrange an independent investigation into my case, an investigation that includes me this time!
Also, because the stress of fighting the Church singlehandedly to stop them killing me caused Bob Hill a severe brain haemmorage, and he was the sole carer for his disabled wife, I believe that the Diocese of Winchester owe Bob and Anne payment for their care for the rest of Bob's life. The Bishop of Winchester seems totally oblivious of the human cost of his and Welby's actions against me and the lasting damage not just to me but to the Hill family, while the Bishop's actions have achieved nothing whatsoever for safeguarding, the opposite in fact. I remain living in fear and in hiding.
Would someone ensure that I am fully and permenantly safeguarded against harm from Bishop Dakin and Archbishop Welby and that their whitewash reports into my case are legally annulled, redacted and removed. This includes the Gladwin report, the Steel report and the Glenys Johnstone Jersey safeguarding partnership report which was also engineered by the Diocese and other agencies to cover up. This is a vulnerable adult's life at risk as I won't withstand any more defamation or lies about me in public.
I am going to end the main letter here and provide you with a few pages of links regarding my case below my signature. Please read the comments on Bob Hill's blogs as well, they tell stories in themselves. Also remember, Bob didn't know me when he started writing these, and he didn't ever meet with me and hear my story but based his blogs on the Korris whitewash and what was going on in Jersey.
regards,
HG/JJ
Bob Hill's blogs on my case:
I am going to put Bob's most recent letter first to show you just how recently the Archbishop of Canterbury has been unpholding corruption by meeting in the press limelight with Abusers and their protectors while shunning their victim:
Please see this letter for one form of Dame Steel's conflicted actions:
This is my guest Posting on Bob's Blog:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)